On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Robbert Kouprie <robbert@xxxxxx> wrote: > Ahem, > >>> Yes, it does not matter whether that flag bit exists or not in ntlmssp >>> auth packet (type 3). >> >> FWIW, I just verified this on my side. It still works without this hunk. > > Not sure what I smoked yesterday, but yesterday's conclusion is NOT correct. > > I actually do need the NTLM2 flag in the AUTH packet as well as the > NEGOTIATE packet, so I do need the extra hunk of the patch that you left out > when you submitted it to the list. > > Regards, > Robbert > Robbert, can you send me the wireshark trace of the failing session setup (auth failure)? I will go through MS-NLMP document also to see what it says about the flags in all three types of packets in ntlmssp exchange. Regards, Shirish -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
