On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:41:05 -0600
shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Indicate to the server a capability of NTLM2 session security (NTLM2 Key)
> during ntlmssp protocol exchange in one of the bits of the flags field.
> If server supports this capability, send NTLM2 key even if signing is not
> required on the server.
> If the server requires signing, the sesison keys exchanged for NTLMv2
> and NTLM2 session security in auth packet of the nlmssp exchange are same.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/cifs/sess.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/sess.c b/fs/cifs/sess.c
> index 7b01d3f..122ad31 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/sess.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/sess.c
> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static void build_ntlmssp_negotiate_blob(unsigned char *pbuffer,
> /* BB is NTLMV2 session security format easier to use here? */
> flags = NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_56 | NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET |
> NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_128 | NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE |
> - NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM;
> + NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM | NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_EXTENDED_SEC;
> if (ses->server->secMode &
> (SECMODE_SIGN_REQUIRED | SECMODE_SIGN_ENABLED)) {
> flags |= NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN;
> @@ -544,8 +544,9 @@ static int build_ntlmssp_auth_blob(unsigned char *pbuffer,
> sec_blob->WorkstationName.MaximumLength = 0;
> tmp += 2;
>
> - if ((ses->ntlmssp->server_flags & NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_KEY_XCH) &&
> - !calc_seckey(ses)) {
> + if (((ses->ntlmssp->server_flags & NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_KEY_XCH) ||
> + ((ses->ntlmssp->server_flags & NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_EXTENDED_SEC)))
^^^
You can (and should) eliminate a set of parenthesis here.
> + && !calc_seckey(ses)) {
> memcpy(tmp, ses->ntlmssp->ciphertext, CIFS_CPHTXT_SIZE);
> sec_blob->SessionKey.BufferOffset = cpu_to_le32(tmp - pbuffer);
> sec_blob->SessionKey.Length = cpu_to_le16(CIFS_CPHTXT_SIZE);
Other than that, it looks reasonable to me. I'll have to take your
word for it that this is the right thing to do as I find the NTLMSSP
spec really difficult to comprehend.
It also might be nice to add:
Reported-and-Tested-by: Robbert Kouprie <robbert@xxxxxx>
...since he did help track this down.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
