On 12/01/2010 10:09 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > 2010/12/1 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx>: >> >> I just applied your patches on my test box, but I see that the fscache >> integration is not done, yet. Am I seeing older version of patches? > > What do you mean for "fscache integration"? I changed all > invalidate_inode_* calls to cifs_invalidate_mapping or setting > invalid_mapping flag - so, it seems to me that I don't miss places > where I affect cache but don't aware of fscache > (cifs_invalidate_mapping process fscache as well). Of course, it can > be - so, could you point me to such places, please? > Sorry about the delay in getting back. You're right the patches are taking care of relinquishing the cookies wherever appropriate. I have done some testing with both 'strictcache' and 'fsc' enabled and so far they work as expected. The tests involve doing file operations with fsc enabled always but strict cache enabled/disabled and watching fscache statistics via /proc/fs/fscache/stats). I didn't encounter any unexpected results. Thanks, -- Suresh Jayaraman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
