On 11/29/2010 10:38 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > 2010/11/29 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx>: >> On 11/29/2010 05:56 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: >>> >>> What's about mmap and fsync patch? How do you think they mix with fscache? >>> >> >> Basically, relinquishing cookie when you are invalidating inode should >> make them work without issues I think. But, I would also test your >> patches (once you post the patchset that includes fscache handling as >> well) to be sure. >> >> > > I reposted patches from 2 to 5(included). So, uptodate set is > > Pavel Shilovsky (6): > CIFS: Make cifsFileInfo_put work with strict cache mode (try #4) > CIFS: Make read call work with strict cache mode (try #3) > CIFS: Make write call work with strict cache mode (try #3) > CIFS: Make cifs_fsync work with strict cache mode (try #3) > CIFS: Make cifs_file_map work with strict cache mode (try #3) > CIFS: Add strictcache mount option (try #2) > I just applied your patches on my test box, but I see that the fscache integration is not done, yet. Am I seeing older version of patches? -- Suresh Jayaraman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
