On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Scott Lovenberg <scott.lovenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/5/2010 8:41 AM, Suresh Jayaraman wrote: >> >> This patchset is a second try at adding persistent, local caching facility >> for >> CIFS using the FS-Cache interface. >> >> > > Just wondering, have you bench marked this at all? I'd be interested to see > how this compares (performance and scaling) to an oplock-centric design. > > I'd hazard a guess that with pipelining support in SMB2 the performance will > be even better since you can have a hot cache and more requests in flight. Yes - very plausibly -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
