On 7/5/2010 8:41 AM, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
This patchset is a second try at adding persistent, local caching facility for
CIFS using the FS-Cache interface.
Just wondering, have you bench marked this at all? I'd be interested to
see how this compares (performance and scaling) to an oplock-centric
design.
I'd hazard a guess that with pipelining support in SMB2 the performance
will be even better since you can have a hot cache and more requests in
flight.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
