Re: [PATCH net-next] can: grcan: move napi_enable() from under spin lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:47:42 -0800 you wrote:
> I don't see any reason why napi_enable() needs to be under the lock,
> only reason I could think of is if the IRQ also took this lock
> but it doesn't. napi_enable() will soon need to sleep.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Marc, if this is correct is it okay for me to take via net-next
> directly? I have a bunch of patches which depend on it.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] can: grcan: move napi_enable() from under spin lock
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7c125d5b767b

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux