On 10.01.2025 18:47:42, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > I don't see any reason why napi_enable() needs to be under the lock, > only reason I could think of is if the IRQ also took this lock > but it doesn't. napi_enable() will soon need to sleep. > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Marc, if this is correct is it okay for me to take via net-next > directly? I have a bunch of patches which depend on it. Yes, please take it via net-next directly. Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
