IXXAT CAN-IB2XX drivers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: IXXAT CAN-IB2XX drivers
- From: Eric Stahl <ericstahl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 23:10:52 -0400
- Cc: marm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@xxxxxxxxx>, socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Florian Ferg <flfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Seiderer <ps.report@xxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Hi,
I was beginning to familiarize myself with the ix_active_can drivers for
IXXAT CAN-IB2XX pci/pcie boards in an attempt to get IXXAT pci/pcie
drivers into the kernel. I noticed that the device driver distributed by
HMS
(https://www.ixxat.com/docs/librariesprovider8/ixxat-english-new/pc-can-interfaces/linux-drivers/socketcan-linux.tgz)
appears to be using the IFI CAN/CANFD core. There already appears to be
a kernel driver (ifi_canfd_plat_driver) that leverages the IFI CAN/CANFD
core. Should I continue to try to get the ix_active_can drivers into the
kernel or should I try to leverage the existing ifi_canfd_plat_driver?
If I should leverage the ifi_canfd_plat_driver, what approach should I
take to get it compatible with the IXXAT pci/pcie cards?
Thanks,
Eric
[Index of Archives]
[Automotive Discussions]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[eCos]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
[CAN Bus]