Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] can: m_can: Use u32 for putidx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] can: m_can: Use u32 for putidx
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:47:49 +0100
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Julien Panis <jpanis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230718075708.958094-7-msp@baylibre.com>
References: <20230718075708.958094-1-msp@baylibre.com> <20230718075708.958094-7-msp@baylibre.com>

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 09:57:02AM +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> putidx is not an integer normally, it is an unsigned field used in
> hardware registers. Use a u32 for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v5 00/12] can: m_can: Optimizations for m_can/tcan part 2
  - From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann
- [PATCH v5 06/12] can: m_can: Use u32 for putidx
  - From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] can: m_can: Write transmit header and data in one transaction
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] can: m_can: Use tx_fifo_in_flight for netif_queue control
Previous by thread: [PATCH v5 06/12] can: m_can: Use u32 for putidx
Next by thread: [PATCH v5 09/12] can: m_can: Introduce a tx_fifo_in_flight counter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Automotive Discussions] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [CAN Bus]