Hello Marc and Max, On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:33 PM Max Staudt <max@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:28:45 +0200 > Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:21 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Ok - We avoided writing bit timing registers from user space into the > > > hardware for all existing drivers. If there isn't a specific use case, > > > let's skip this patch. If someone comes up with a use case we can think > > > of a proper solution. > > > > Ok. So do I also remove the 7/9 "ethtool: add support to get/set CAN > > bit time register" > > patch ? > > If I may answer as well - IMHO, yes. > > Unless we know that BTR is something other than just a different way to > express the bitrate, I'd skip it, yes. Because bitrate is already > handled by other, cross-device mechanisms. Thanks to both of you for the explanations. Regards, Dario > > > Max -- Dario Binacchi Embedded Linux Developer dario.binacchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx __________________________________ Amarula Solutions SRL Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT T. +39 042 243 5310 info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.amarulasolutions.com
