On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:28:45 +0200 Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:21 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Ok - We avoided writing bit timing registers from user space into the > > hardware for all existing drivers. If there isn't a specific use case, > > let's skip this patch. If someone comes up with a use case we can think > > of a proper solution. > > Ok. So do I also remove the 7/9 "ethtool: add support to get/set CAN > bit time register" > patch ? If I may answer as well - IMHO, yes. Unless we know that BTR is something other than just a different way to express the bitrate, I'd skip it, yes. Because bitrate is already handled by other, cross-device mechanisms. Max
