On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 28.06.2022 10:09:16, Vincent MAILHOL wrote: > > > In light of this, while I remain committed to helping work the problem, I > > > can't help but wonder if it's worth it to consider my original patch in a > > > new light? > > > > Yes, it makes sense to take your initial patch. > > done Thanks. At this point, is there anything more needed from me on that patch? Addition of Reviewed-by: lines or similar? > > I will reiterate that > > I do not like the way it is done but you are fixing a memory leak and > > delaying the fix furthermore is not good. As an addendum, I think I might have found a way to scare up resources and time for that benchmarking work, so while I don't want to start making promises, there's a reasonable chance we might be able to do this in the next few weeks. Best, Rhett
