Re: can: m_can: tcan4x5x m_can_isr do not handle tx if rx fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22.02.2022 12:14:23, Michael Anochin wrote:
> In the context of the ENOBUFS problem by using can interfaces under higher
> load:
> 
> In m_can_isr handler, if rx fails (m_can_rx_peripheral), then no
> netif_wake_queue(dev) will be called. Can this lead to ENOBUFS?

Yes - Can you send a fix?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux