can: m_can: tcan4x5x m_can_isr do not handle tx if rx fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In the context of the ENOBUFS problem by using can interfaces under higher load:

In m_can_isr handler, if rx fails (m_can_rx_peripheral), then no netif_wake_queue(dev) will be called. Can this lead to ENOBUFS?




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux