Re: MCP2518FD Drivers Rarely Working with Custom Kernel 5.10.Y

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 23.06.21 um 04:59 schrieb Joshua Quesenberry:
> Thank you Marc, I had tried finding a Linux CAN forum, but
> unfortunately searching for "CAN" in Google is about the most
> unhelpful search term one could use... so thanks for replying and
> getting me to a more appropriate audience.
> 
> Reverting my system back to where CAN was working will probably be
> challenging. Our main goal was to get Boot from USB on the RPi
> enabled, but this unfortunately meant upgrading every piece of
> software and firmware available... previously we were still on Buster,
> but the OS snapshot was from Spring 2020 (if not Fall/Winter 2019), if
> not earlier, the firmware was much older, and the kernel was 4.19.73,
> wherein the MCP251XFD driver didn't exist yet. So getting back there
> will mean throwing a saved SD Card image on from Spring 2020 and then
> trying to figure out how to force downgrade the firmware. A colleague
> started this upgrade process for another project and was seeing these
> same results on two separate RPi, he did the OS and firmware upgrades,
> but I did the building of the 5.10.17 kernel. So including those two
> RPi and mine, that's three total systems with mostly non-working CAN
> where it had been working fine, my system has slightly newer RPi
> firmware now and the 5.10.44 kernel, the hope was maybe I'd pick up a
> patch somewhere, but no such luck. If you still think it would be
> beneficial to go through the effort of downgrading everything to
> verify the hardware I can do that, but just want to make sure before I
> start that since it'll take a while.
> 
> I updated spi.c to include printing the error number as you requested
> and that's all baking now. When I get into work in the morning (US
> EST) I'll get the changes deployed and try it out. Since this issue is
> a very high failure rate, getting a log shouldn't be an issue.
> 
> Some background on the custom kernel... when I switched to the 5.10.Y
> branch, I used arch/arm/configs/bcm2711_defconfig as my base config
> and then switched on preempt, switched to 1000Hz kernel timer,
> switched the default governor from powersave to ondemand, switched on
> debug flag (CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y), enabled a few different CAN drivers
> we may encounter, and enabled some stuff for the WM8782 I2S chip. I
> probably should have recreated my config after 5.10.44, but I hadn't
> considered till this writing, looking at this diff there a few bits
> that are new I probably could benefit from including, but I don't see
> anything that I'd be concerned about.
> 
> `diff bcm2711_defconfig hel_bcm2711_lowlatency_defconfig`
> 15d14
> < CONFIG_ATA=m
> 43d41
> < CONFIG_BH1750=m
> 53c51
> < CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NVME=y
> ---
>> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NVME=m
> 120c118
> < CONFIG_CAN_J1939=m
> ---
>> CONFIG_CAN_KVASER_USB=m
> 123a122,123
>> CONFIG_CAN_MCP25XXFD=m
>> CONFIG_CAN_PEAK_USB=m
> 127d126
> < CONFIG_CCS811=m
> 155c154
> < CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE=y
> ---
>> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
> 158,159c157
> < CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
> < CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
> ---
>> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=y
> 184a183
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y
> 209d207
> < CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_JDI_LT070ME05000=m
> 319a318
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY=y
> 325d323
> < CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X_IRQ=y
> 395a394
>> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
> 561d559
> < CONFIG_IR_TOY=m
> 826d823
> < CONFIG_NF_LOG_ARP=m
> 828d824
> < CONFIG_NF_LOG_NETDEV=m
> 950c946
> < CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> ---
>> CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
> 957d952
> < CONFIG_QCA7000_UART=m
> 994d988
> < CONFIG_RPI_POE_POWER=m
> 1040a1035
>> # CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS is not set
> 1044,1045d1038
> < CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=m
> < CONFIG_SATA_MV=m
> 1054d1046
> < CONFIG_SENSIRION_SGP30=m
> 1134a1127
>> CONFIG_SND_RPI_I2S_AUDIO_WM8782=m
> 1149a1143
>> CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8782=m
> 
> The /boot/config.txt I included in the forum posts mentioned is
> tweaking the 40-pin header quite a bit from the default setup, we're
> using many of the pins for our HAT and planned for possibly adding
> more in the future.

Hi,

it would help to find a reference to that config.txt .

Regarding the changed Kconfig flags, I would suspect everything that
owns a =y to be the culprit, especially everything that has connections
to a clock.
Ever since the first rpi3, clocks are unreliable in general due to the
frequency governor. The rpi guys did there best to get rid of most of
the initial problems but the root cause remains.

The interesting question is, does a stock raspbian buster work with your
hardware and that config.txt?

I'm running a stock raspbian buster on a rpi3b+ with seeed can fd hat v2
24/7 for a couple of month now and did not expierence any problems.

Regards,
Patrick



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux