Hi Angelo,
On 17/6/21 9:16 am, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
Add platform data object for ColdFire architecture.
---
Changes for v2:
- move header file in more proper location
- remove irq defines
- change variable types to match driver types
Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/can/platform/mcf5441x.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/linux/can/platform/mcf5441x.h
diff --git a/include/linux/can/platform/mcf5441x.h b/include/linux/can/platform/mcf5441x.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6866f0f60caf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/can/platform/mcf5441x.h
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Flexcan options for ColdFire family
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Angelo Dureghello <angelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _PLAT_FLEXCAN_MCF_H
+#define _PLAT_FLEXCAN_MCF_H
+
+struct mcf_flexcan_platform_data {
+ u8 clk_src;
+ u32 clock_frequency;
+ bool big_endian;
+};
+
+#define FLEXCAN_MCF5411X_MB_CNT_MCF 16
+
+#endif /* _PLAT_FLEXCAN_MCF_H */
Is this actually specific to the ColdFire M5411x SoC?
I thought a number of other ColdFire parts also have canbus support.
Are they not all the same underlying hardware block?
So should this be more generic, say flexcan.h or mcf_flexcan.h or something like that?
Regards
Greg
