Re: [PATCH RFC can-next 0/3] m_can: support device-specific interrupt handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.05.2021 17:44:55, Torin Cooper-Bennun wrote:
> > Proper error handling is not trivial....and from my experience, in most
> > cases the documentation of those kinds of errors and how to recover is
> > quite sparse, I haven't looked deep into the tcan4x5x docs though.
> 
> I guess I should give credit where it's due, in that the driver works
> fine without full error handling for the vast majority of cases. It may
> just be that the application I'm working on is more sensitive to faults.
> 
> The docs are fairly sparse on error handling from a programmer's
> perspective, yes. I've learned more from experience with this chip than
> from the datasheet!

That's exactly what I meant :D

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux