On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 02:26:10PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 14.05.2021 13:19:44, Torin Cooper-Bennun wrote: > > This callback will allow M_CAN-based devices, e.g. TI TCAN4550, to > > handle device-specific interrupts which are not part of the M_CAN core, > > but are signaled on the same interrupt pin. > > > > Signed-off-by: Torin Cooper-Bennun <torin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Another option would be to register a 2nd threaded interrupt handler in > the tcan4x5x driver....But this is much simpler. Total separation of the two does make some sense. Events arising from the device-specific interrupt handling would be things like under-/over-voltage faults, CAN stuck dominant, SPI malfunction, etc... things that M_CAN shouldn't have to care about at all. -- Regards, Torin Cooper-Bennun Software Engineer | maxiluxsystems.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
