On 17.03.2021 00:16:01, Vincent MAILHOL wrote: > > I just had a look at the ethtool-netlink interface: > > > > | Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst > > > > this is much better designed than the CAN netlink interface. It was done > > by the pros and much later than CAN. :D So I'd like to have a similar > > structure for new CAN netlink stuff. > > > > So I think I'll remove this patch for now from can-next-testing. The > > kernel internal interface to tdc is still OK, we can leave it as is and > > change it if needed. But netlink is user space and I'd like to have it > > properly designed. > > Understood. However, I will need more time to read and understand > the ethtool-netlink interface. The new patch will come later, I > do not know when. No Problem Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
