Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] can: c_can: fix control interface used by c_can_do_tx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kurt,

> Il 02/03/2021 19:44 Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
> 
>  
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:38:52 +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > According to commit 640916db2bf7 ("can: c_can: Make it SMP safe") let RX use
> > IF1 (i.e. IF_RX) and TX use IF2 (i.e. IF_TX).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > (no changes since v1)
> > 
> >  drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> > index dbcc1c1c92d6..69526c3a671c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> > @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> >  		idx--;
> >  		pend &= ~(1 << idx);
> >  		obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> > -		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_RX, obj);
> > +		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);
> 
> Right. I had a similar effort last year to increase the reception
> throughput, but I ended with some sporadic strange tx echo problems.
> This fix may have fixed my problem as well.

Take a look at https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1384649/

Thanks and regards,
Dario
> 
> >  		can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
> >  		bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
> >  		pkts++;
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux