Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] can: c_can: fix control interface used by c_can_do_tx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:38:52 +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> According to commit 640916db2bf7 ("can: c_can: Make it SMP safe") let RX use
> IF1 (i.e. IF_RX) and TX use IF2 (i.e. IF_TX).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
>  drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> index dbcc1c1c92d6..69526c3a671c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
>  		idx--;
>  		pend &= ~(1 << idx);
>  		obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> -		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_RX, obj);
> +		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);

Right. I had a similar effort last year to increase the reception
throughput, but I ended with some sporadic strange tx echo problems.
This fix may have fixed my problem as wel.

>  		can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
>  		bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
>  		pkts++;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux