Re: can, tcan4x5x: look to merge rpi support into rpi kernel tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 02:39:36PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > Am I correct in saying that rx-offload requires RX timestamps to be
> > available?
> 
> Proper timestamps for RX and TX would be best, but you can use
> can_rx_offload_queue_tail() if you don't have any timestamps.
> 
> > They can be enabled in M_CAN, but the v3.3 manual states that
> > the internal timestamp generation (apparently only option for tcan4x5x)
> > cannot be used for CAN-FD.
> 
> Can you give me a reference to this?

Here's the manual for 3.3 (annoyingly, I can't find corresponding
documents for earlier M_CAN versions, and TCAN4550 uses 3.2...)

http://www.bosch-semiconductors.com/media/ip_modules/pdf_2/m_can/mcan_users_manual_v330.pdf

See Section 2.3.9, "Timestamp Counter Configuration (TSCC)". Quote:

    Note: With CAN FD an external counter is required for timestamp
    generation (TSS = “10”)

--
Regards,

Torin Cooper-Bennun
Software Engineer | maxiluxsystems.com




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux