Re: can, tcan4x5x: look to merge rpi support into rpi kernel tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26.02.2021 13:26:20, Torin Cooper-Bennun wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > I think you cannot do (synchronous) SPI from NAPI (which is SoftIRQ context).
> 
> I see. I now understand why you recommend using mcp251xfd as a template
> for m_can.
> 
> Am I correct in saying that rx-offload requires RX timestamps to be
> available?

Proper timestamps for RX and TX would be best, but you can use
can_rx_offload_queue_tail() if you don't have any timestamps.

> They can be enabled in M_CAN, but the v3.3 manual states that
> the internal timestamp generation (apparently only option for tcan4x5x)
> cannot be used for CAN-FD.

Can you give me a reference to this?

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux