On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:30:35 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Since 20dd3850bcf8 ("can: Speed up CAN frame receiption by using
> ml_priv") the CAN framework uses per device specific data in the AF_CAN
> protocol. For this purpose the struct net_device->ml_priv is used. Later
> the ml_priv usage in CAN was extended for other users, one of them being
> CAN_J1939.
>
> Later in the kernel ml_priv was converted to an union, used by other
> drivers. E.g. the tun driver started storing it's stats pointer.
>
> Since tun devices can claim to be a CAN device, CAN specific protocols
> will wrongly interpret this pointer, which will cause system crashes.
> Mostly this issue is visible in the CAN_J1939 stack.
>
> To fix this issue, we request a dedicated CAN pointer within the
> net_device struct.
No strong objection, others already added their pointers, but
I wonder if we can't save those couple of bytes by adding a
ml_priv_type, to check instead of dev->type? And leave it 0
for drivers using stats?
That way other device types which are limited by all being
ARPHDR_ETHER can start using ml_priv as well?
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CAN)
> + struct can_ml_priv *can;
> +#endif
Perhaps put it next to all the _ptr fields?
