[PATCH] can: avoid double unlikely() notation when using IS_ERR()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation
when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this
reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of
IS_ERR() itself.

Clean up code by removing redundant notation.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <a@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c b/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c
index 450c5cfcb3fc..3c1912c0430b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ can_rx_offload_offload_one(struct can_rx_offload *offload, unsigned int n)
 	/* There was a problem reading the mailbox, propagate
 	 * error value.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(IS_ERR(skb))) {
+	if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
 		offload->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
 		offload->dev->stats.rx_fifo_errors++;
 
-- 
2.29.2




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux