On 11/15/20 2:39 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 17:35:01 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Two invalid fixes tags here, do you want to respin or should I pull?
Let me respin this. It'll have the new date tag of today (15th).
> Just realized you probably have these objects in your tree so it'd be
> useful if I told you which ones ;)
I haven't checked the fixes tags, they were added by the submitter of the patch.
How do you test for the fixes? Is that script avaiable somewhere?
> Commit: be719591ede2 ("can: m_can: Fix freeing of can device from peripherials")
> Fixes tag: Fixes: d42f4e1d06d9 ("can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework")
> Has these problem(s):
> - Target SHA1 does not exist
> Commit: aff1dea235ee ("can: m_can: m_can_class_free_dev(): introduce new function")
> Fixes tag: Fixes: d42f4e1d06d9 ("can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework")
> Has these problem(s):
> - Target SHA1 does not exist
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
