Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Correct interrupt flags in examples

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:59:39 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> have the same meaning:
> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW  = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> 
> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted some
> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
>   ACTIVE_LOW  => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
>   ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 2 +-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nxp-nci.txt  | 2 +-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/pn544.txt    | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux