RE: mcp25xxfd: missing cerrif

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On the transition from "TX ERROR_WARNING -> TX ERROR_ACTIVE" the
> CERRIF
> is not set.

Mhm, do I misunderstand your point here? The Transition TX ERROR_WARNING -> TX ERROR_ACTIVE isn't covered by the CERRIF interrupt (which matches the documentation). The interrupt bit gets set on ERROR_Passive to ERROR_ACTIVE (TEC/REC goes from 128 to 127). At that transition I do see the CERRIF bit. It is correct and intended (though maybe not 100% intuitive) that going from ERROR_WARNING to ERROR_ACTIVE TEC/REC 96 to 95 CERRIF is NOT being set.

Best Regards,
Thomas




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux