commit c223da689324 ("can: xilinx_can: Add support for CANFD FD frames") is writing data to a wrong offset for FD frames. This patch fixes this issue. Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <Shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 29 ++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c index 2d3399e..c9b951b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c @@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ enum xcan_reg { #define XCAN_FRAME_DLC_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x04) #define XCAN_FRAME_DW1_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x08) #define XCAN_FRAME_DW2_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x0C) -#define XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base, n) (((frame_base) + 0x08) + \ - ((n) * XCAN_CANFD_FRAME_SIZE)) +#define XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x08) #define XCAN_CANFD_FRAME_SIZE 0x48 #define XCAN_TXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(n) (XCAN_TXMSG_BASE_OFFSET + \ @@ -600,7 +599,7 @@ static void xcan_write_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, if (priv->devtype.cantype == XAXI_CANFD || priv->devtype.cantype == XAXI_CANFD_2_0) { for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) { - ramoff = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_offset, dwindex) + + ramoff = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_offset) + (dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES); priv->write_reg(priv, ramoff, be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)(cf->data + i))); @@ -816,10 +815,8 @@ static int xcanfd_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int frame_base) struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats; struct canfd_frame *cf; struct sk_buff *skb; - u32 id_xcan, dlc, data[2] = {0, 0}, dwindex = 0, i, fsr, readindex; + u32 id_xcan, dlc, data[2] = {0, 0}, dwindex = 0, i, dw_offset; - fsr = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FSR_OFFSET); - readindex = fsr & XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK; id_xcan = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FRAME_ID_OFFSET(frame_base)); dlc = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FRAME_DLC_OFFSET(frame_base)); if (dlc & XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK) @@ -863,26 +860,16 @@ static int xcanfd_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int frame_base) /* Check the frame received is FD or not*/ if (dlc & XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK) { for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) { - if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2) - data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, - (XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) + - (dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES))); - else - data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, - (XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) + - (dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES))); + dw_offset = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base) + + (dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES); + data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, dw_offset); *(__be32 *)(cf->data + i) = cpu_to_be32(data[0]); dwindex++; } } else { for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) { - if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2) - data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, - XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) + - i); - else - data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, - XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) + i); + dw_offset = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base); + data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, dw_offset + i); *(__be32 *)(cf->data + i) = cpu_to_be32(data[0]); } } -- 2.7.4