Hello Konstantin, m 09.08.19 um 18:46 schrieb FIXED-TERM Buecheler Konstantin (ETAS-SEC/ECT-Mu): > >> Konstantin > >>> On 7/29/19 6:19 AM, FIXED-TERM Buecheler Konstantin (ETAS-SEC/ECT-Mu) wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am currently working on a project where I am trying to use the tcan4550 chip with a Raspberry PI 3B. >>> I am struggling to create a working device tree overlay file for the Raspberry Pi. >>> Has anyone here tried this already? I would appreciate any help. > >> Are you using the driver from net-next? > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/tree/drivers/net/can/m_can > > Yes, I am using the driver from net-next. > > >> DT documentation here > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt > > I saw this documentation but it didn’t help much (As I said, I don’t have much experience with device trees) . My dts file currently looks like this: > > /dts-v1/; > /plugin/; > > / { > compatible = "brcm,bcm2835", "brcm,bcm2836", "brcm,bcm2708", "brcm,bcm2709"; > fragment@0 { > target = <&spi0>; > __overlay__ { > status = "okay"; > spidev@0{ > status = "disabled"; > }; > }; > }; > > fragment@2 { > compatible = "bosch, m_can"; > target = <&spi0>; > __overlay__ { > tcan4x5x: tcan4x5x@0 { > compatible = "ti,tcan4x5x"; > reg = <0>; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; > bosch,mram-cfg = <0x0 0 0 32 0 0 1 1>; > data-ready-gpios = <&gpio 23 0>; > device-wake-gpios = <&gpio 24 1>; > > }; > }; > }; > }; > > > Checking dmesg I always see these errors: > [ 5.409051] tcan4x5x spi0.0: no clock found > [ 5.409064] tcan4x5x spi0.0: no CAN clock source defined > [ 5.409125] tcan4x5x spi0.0: data-ready gpio not defined > [ 5.409135] tcan4x5x spi0.0: Probe failed, err=-22 > > I already fixed the clock issue once by doing something like this: > clocks = <&can0_osc>, > <&can0_osc>; > clock-names = "hclk", "cclk"; > But that didn’t fix the " data-ready gpio not defined" error. > > >> I did the development on a BeagleBone Black. Before fiddling with the dynamic device tree, I would try to patch normal device tree source files first. Wolfgang
