Re: [PATCH 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load
From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:29:43 +0300
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190724210328.D91DF21873@mail.kernel.org>
References: <20190724130322.31702-3-mkl@pengutronix.de> <20190724210328.D91DF21873@mail.kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
> 
> How should we proceed with this patch?

I don't know.
Maintainer did not respond, nor to original send nor to resend.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load
  - From: Marc Kleine-Budde

References:
- [PATCH 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load
  - From: Marc Kleine-Budde

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][next] can: kvaser_pciefd: remove redundant negative check on trigger
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Automotive Discussions] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [CAN Bus]

Powered by Linux