On 7/25/19 9:38 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> Kindly pinging...
>
> After you git pull request for linux-can-next-for-5.4-20190724, some patches are missing from linux-can-next/testing.
> can: flexcan: flexcan_mailbox_read() make use of flexcan_write64() to mark the mailbox as read
> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): add support for TX mailbox in iflag1
> can: flexcan: flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(): optimize reading
> can: flexcan: introduce struct flexcan_priv::tx_mask and make use of it
> can: flexcan: convert struct flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2} to rx_mask
> can: flexcan: remove TX mailbox bit from struct flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2}
> can: flexcan: rename struct flexcan_priv::reg_imask{1,2}_default to rx_mask{1,2}
> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): rename variable reg_iflag -> reg_iflag_rx
> can: flexcan: rename macro FLEXCAN_IFLAG_MB() -> FLEXCAN_IFLAG2_MB()
>
> You can refer to below link for the reason of adding above patches:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg00777.html
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg01150.html
>
> Are you prepared to add back these patches as they are necessary for
> Flexcan CAN FD? And this Flexcan CAN FD patch set is based on these
> patches.
Yes, these patches will be added back.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
