Re: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP Flexcan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/25/19 9:38 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> Kindly pinging...
> 
> After you git pull request for linux-can-next-for-5.4-20190724, some patches are missing from linux-can-next/testing.
> can: flexcan: flexcan_mailbox_read() make use of flexcan_write64() to mark the mailbox as read
> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): add support for TX mailbox in iflag1
> can: flexcan: flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(): optimize reading
> can: flexcan: introduce struct flexcan_priv::tx_mask and make use of it
> can: flexcan: convert struct flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2} to rx_mask
> can: flexcan: remove TX mailbox bit from struct flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2}
> can: flexcan: rename struct flexcan_priv::reg_imask{1,2}_default to rx_mask{1,2}
> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): rename variable reg_iflag -> reg_iflag_rx
> can: flexcan: rename macro FLEXCAN_IFLAG_MB() -> FLEXCAN_IFLAG2_MB()
> 
> You can refer to below link for the reason of adding above patches:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg00777.html
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg01150.html
> 
> Are you prepared to add back these patches as they are necessary for
> Flexcan CAN FD? And this Flexcan CAN FD patch set is based on these
> patches.

Yes, these patches will be added back.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux