On 7/25/19 8:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:36:02AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Hello >> >> On 7/24/19 1:47 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:14:14AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> On 7/10/19 7:08 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> On 6/17/19 10:09 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>> Marc >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/10/19 11:35 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>> Bump >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>>> Marc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bump >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/31/19 6:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>>>> Marc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/15/19 3:54 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Marc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/19 11:11 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Create a m_can platform framework that peripheral >>>>>>>>>>> devices can register to and use common code and register sets. >>>>>>>>>>> The peripheral devices may provide read/write and configuration >>>>>>>>>>> support of the IP. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> v12 - Update the m_can_read/write functions to >>>>>>>>>>> create a backtrace if the callback >>>>>>>>>>> pointer is NULL. - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052302/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is this able to be merged now? >>>>>>>>> ping >>>>>> Wondering if there is anything else we need to do? >>>>>> >>>>>> The part has officially shipped and we had hoped to have driver >>>>>> support in Linux as part of the announcement. >>>>>> >>>>> Is this being sent in a PR for 5.3? >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>> Adding Greg to this thread as I have no idea what is going on with this. >>> Why me? What am I supposed to do here? I see no patches at all to do >>> anything with :( >> >> I am not sure who to email. The maintainer seems to be on hiatus or super >> busy with other work. > > Who is the maintainer? That's me. >> So I added you to see if you know how to handle this. Wolfgang Acked it but >> he said Marc needs to pull > > Then work with them, again, what can I do if I can't even see the > patches here? The patches are included in a pull request to David Miller (net-next/master, the CAN upstream), which has already have been merged. >> it in. We have quite a few users of this patchset. I have been hosting the >> patchset in a different tree. >> >> These users keep pinging us for upstream status and all we can do is point >> them to the >> >> LKML to show we are continuing to pursue inclusion. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=393454 > > Looks sane, work with the proper developers, good luck! Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature