On 7/24/19 11:22 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > why didn't you include the CAN FD support for the can-gw? I wanted to have a look at the patches. But the other patches are already reviewed. I'll do another pull-request this week. > [PATCH 1/2] can: gw: use struct canfd_frame as internal data structure > https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=156388681922741&w=2 > > [PATCH 2/2] can: gw: add support for CAN FD frames > https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=156388682022742&w=2 > > The patches have already been sent in January as RFC and I did extensive > testing since then. Good. regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
