Hello Kristoff, as discussed, let's move this discussion to the linux-can mailing list. regards, Marc --- Dear Marc, Recently I started working with Van Hool, a Belgian touring car manufacturer that is using the J1939 stack for some of its intelligent devices. I would like to introduce a test platform for internal application development. In search for a solution I discovered your major contribution to Linux for CAN and J1939. As a pilot case, I merged your code to a recent Raspberry Pi kernel, which appears to be working fine at first glance. Now I have a little question: why was the J1939 stack built into the kernel? Do you think it would be an interesting contribution if I isolated the functionality in user space? That way we could test our application code along with the isolated J1939 stack on whatever CAN-enabled Linux platform is provided to us. Do you think this is a bad idea? Thank you for your opinion! Kind regards, Kristoff Kristoff Avermaete SBBC Electrical engineering Van Hool NV 'Tel. : +32 3 420 27 88 ›Mail : kristoff.avermaete@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kristoff.avermaete@xxxxxxxxxx> üSite : www.vanhool.be Beschrijving: cid:image002.gif@01CDF571.77C5E560 DISCLAIMER: Any email committing our company needs to be approved by the managing director. This email and its attachments are for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then please delete it and notify the sender by return email. In case of doubt about correctness or completeness of this email please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation. Warning: Any mail sent to this e-mail address is considered as company mail and can be opened by the Management. Van Hool conditions are applicable and this without reservation on all offers, sales, purchases,…
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
