Re: [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: arm: renesas: Add si-linux cat87[45] boards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:59:12PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:32:37PM +0000, Chris Paterson wrote:
> > Hello Simon,
> > 
> > > From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: 17 January 2019 10:51
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:37:45PM +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> > > > This patch adds board cat874 (powered by the RZ/G2E) and board
> > > > cat875 (that sits on top of cat874). Both boards are made by
> > > > Silicon Linux.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml
> > > > index 5e9d486..9e1e07b 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml
> > > > @@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ properties:
> > > >
> > > >        - description: RZ/G2E (R8A774C0)
> > > >          items:
> > > > +          - enum:
> > > > +              - si-linux,cat874 # Silicon Linux RZ/G2E 96board platform (CAT874)
> > > 
> > > Can I confirm that "96board platform" is correct for this board - I don't
> > > see it in the documentation I have, but that may not mean much.
> > 
> > The board follows the extended version of the Linaro 96board consumer edition (CE) specification [1].
> > 
> > You can see a pretty picture of the board on the CIP Blog [2].
> > 
> > [1] https://www.96boards.org/specifications/
> > [2] https://www.cip-project.org/blog/2018/10/23/renesas-rz-g2m-96ce-board-adopted-as-arm64-reference-board-for-the-next-cip-slts-kernel
> 
> Thanks Chris, in that case I am fine with this patch.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > > That aside, I'd like to wait for Rob to indicate if he will accept
> > > patch 1, which adds si-linux as a vendor, before I apply this patch.

It appears that the use of si-linux as a vendor name.
Accordingly I have applied this patch for v5.1.

...



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux