Wolfgang Thanks for the review On 1/22/19 2:16 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello Dan, > > looks already quite good... > > Am 17.01.19 um 21:05 schrieb Dan Murphy: >> Create a m_can platform framework that peripherial >> devices can register to and use common code and register sets. >> The peripherial devices may provide read/write and configuration >> support of the IP. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 6 + >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.h | 163 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 378 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.h >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c >> index 9b449400376b..f817b28582e9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c >> @@ -414,6 +414,9 @@ static inline void m_can_config_endisable(const struct m_can_priv *priv, >> u32 timeout = 10; >> u32 val = 0; >> >> + if (cccr & CCCR_CSR) >> + cccr &= ~CCCR_CSR; >> + > > This is an unrelated change/fix. Should go somewhere else. > I thought I pulled this and the change below out of of this patchset. >> if (enable) { >> /* enable m_can configuration */ >> m_can_write(priv, M_CAN_CCCR, cccr | CCCR_INIT); >> @@ -1155,6 +1158,9 @@ static void m_can_chip_config(struct net_device *dev) >> m_can_set_bittiming(dev); >> >> m_can_config_endisable(priv, false); >> + >> + if (priv->device_init) >> + priv->device_init(priv); >> } >> >> static void m_can_start(struct net_device *dev) >> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..03172911323a >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ >> +/* >> + * CAN bus driver for Bosch M_CAN controller >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. >> + * Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> + * >> + * Bosch M_CAN user manual can be obtained from: >> + * http://www.bosch-semiconductors.de/media/pdf_1/ipmodules_1/m_can/ >> + * mcan_users_manual_v302.pdf >> + * >> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public >> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any >> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <linux/clk.h> >> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> >> +#include <linux/io.h> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> +#include <linux/netdevice.h> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> +#include <linux/can/dev.h> >> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> >> + >> +#include "m_can_platform.h" >> + >> +struct m_can_plat_priv { >> + void __iomem *base; >> + void __iomem *mram_base; >> +}; >> + >> +static u32 iomap_read_reg(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int reg) >> +{ >> + struct m_can_plat_priv *priv = (struct m_can_plat_priv *)m_can_class->device_data; >> + >> + return readl(priv->base + reg); >> +} >> + >> +static u32 iomap_read_fifo(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int addr_offset) > > Why not just "offset". > I can change the name >> +{ >> + struct m_can_plat_priv *priv = (struct m_can_plat_priv *)m_can_class->device_data; >> + >> + return readl(priv->mram_base + addr_offset); >> +} >> + >> +static int iomap_write_reg(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int reg, int val) >> +{ >> + struct m_can_plat_priv *priv = (struct m_can_plat_priv *)m_can_class->device_data; >> + >> + writel(val, priv->base + reg); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int iomap_write_fifo(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int addr_offset, int val) >> +{ >> + struct m_can_plat_priv *priv = (struct m_can_plat_priv *)m_can_class->device_data; >> + >> + writel(val, priv->base + addr_offset); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int m_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct m_can_classdev *mcan_class; >> + struct m_can_plat_priv *priv; >> + struct resource *res; >> + void __iomem *addr; >> + void __iomem *mram_addr; >> + int irq, ret = 0; >> + >> + mcan_class = m_can_core_allocate_dev(&pdev->dev); >> + priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!priv) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + mcan_class->device_data = priv; >> + >> + m_can_core_get_clocks(mcan_class); >> + >> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "m_can"); >> + addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); >> + irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "int0"); >> + if (IS_ERR(addr) || irq < 0) { >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto failed_ret; >> + } >> + >> + /* message ram could be shared */ >> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "message_ram"); >> + if (!res) { >> + ret = -ENODEV; >> + goto failed_ret; >> + } >> + >> + mram_addr = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res)); >> + if (!mram_addr) { >> + ret = -ENOMEM; >> + goto failed_ret; >> + } >> + >> + priv->base = addr; >> + priv->mram_base = mram_addr; >> + >> + mcan_class->net->irq = irq; >> + mcan_class->pm_clock_support = 1; >> + mcan_class->can.clock.freq = clk_get_rate(mcan_class->cclk); >> + mcan_class->dev = &pdev->dev; >> + >> + mcan_class->read_reg = &iomap_read_reg; >> + mcan_class->write_reg = &iomap_write_reg; >> + mcan_class->write_fifo = &iomap_write_fifo; >> + mcan_class->read_fifo = &iomap_read_fifo; > > No "&" please! > OK. But can I ask why? >> + mcan_class->is_peripherial = false; >> + >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mcan_class->dev); >> + >> + m_can_init_ram(mcan_class); >> + >> + ret = m_can_core_register(mcan_class); >> + >> +failed_ret: >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static __maybe_unused int m_can_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + return m_can_core_suspend(dev); >> +} >> + >> +static __maybe_unused int m_can_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + return m_can_core_resume(dev); >> +} >> + >> +static int m_can_plat_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct net_device *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + struct m_can_classdev *mcan_class = netdev_priv(dev); >> + >> + m_can_core_unregister(mcan_class); >> + >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int __maybe_unused m_can_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct net_device *ndev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + struct m_can_classdev *mcan_class = netdev_priv(ndev); >> + >> + m_can_core_suspend(dev); >> + >> + clk_disable_unprepare(mcan_class->cclk); >> + clk_disable_unprepare(mcan_class->hclk); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int __maybe_unused m_can_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct net_device *ndev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + struct m_can_classdev *mcan_class = netdev_priv(ndev); >> + int err; >> + >> + err = clk_prepare_enable(mcan_class->hclk); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + >> + err = clk_prepare_enable(mcan_class->cclk); >> + if (err) >> + clk_disable_unprepare(mcan_class->hclk); >> + >> + m_can_core_resume(dev); >> + >> + return err; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct dev_pm_ops m_can_pmops = { >> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(m_can_runtime_suspend, >> + m_can_runtime_resume, NULL) >> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(m_can_suspend, m_can_resume) >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct of_device_id m_can_of_table[] = { >> + { .compatible = "bosch,m_can", .data = NULL }, >> + { /* sentinel */ }, >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, m_can_of_table); >> + >> +static struct platform_driver m_can_plat_driver = { >> + .driver = { >> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, >> + .of_match_table = m_can_of_table, >> + .pm = &m_can_pmops, >> + }, >> + .probe = m_can_plat_probe, >> + .remove = m_can_plat_remove, >> +}; >> + >> +module_platform_driver(m_can_plat_driver); >> + >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"); > > Feel free to add yourself as second author. > >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CAN bus driver for Bosch M_CAN controller"); >> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.h b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..97e90dd79613 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.h > > These are common definitions, right? Therefore the filen name should be > "m_can.h"!? > Ah yes. My mistake common m_can definitions should be just m_can. >> @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +// Copyright (C) 2018 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ >> + >> +#ifndef _CAN_M_CAN_CORE_H_ >> +#define _CAN_M_CAN_CORE_H_ >> + >> +#include <linux/can/core.h> >> +#include <linux/can/led.h> >> +#include <linux/completion.h> >> +#include <linux/device.h> >> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> >> +#include <linux/freezer.h> >> +#include <linux/slab.h> >> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> >> +#include <linux/clk.h> >> +#include <linux/delay.h> >> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> >> +#include <linux/io.h> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> +#include <linux/netdevice.h> >> +#include <linux/of.h> >> +#include <linux/of_device.h> >> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> >> +#include <linux/can/dev.h> >> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> > > Do you really need them all in this header file? > Probably not just a copy paste from the original m_can. I will go through them and keep the common headers. >> + >> +/* m_can lec values */ >> +enum m_can_lec_type { >> + LEC_NO_ERROR = 0, >> + LEC_STUFF_ERROR, >> + LEC_FORM_ERROR, >> + LEC_ACK_ERROR, >> + LEC_BIT1_ERROR, >> + LEC_BIT0_ERROR, >> + LEC_CRC_ERROR, >> + LEC_UNUSED, >> +}; >> + >> +enum m_can_mram_cfg { >> + MRAM_SIDF = 0, >> + MRAM_XIDF, >> + MRAM_RXF0, >> + MRAM_RXF1, >> + MRAM_RXB, >> + MRAM_TXE, >> + MRAM_TXB, >> + MRAM_CFG_NUM, >> +}; >> + >> +/* registers definition */ >> +enum m_can_reg { >> + M_CAN_CREL = 0x0, >> + M_CAN_ENDN = 0x4, >> + M_CAN_CUST = 0x8, >> + M_CAN_DBTP = 0xc, >> + M_CAN_TEST = 0x10, >> + M_CAN_RWD = 0x14, >> + M_CAN_CCCR = 0x18, >> + M_CAN_NBTP = 0x1c, >> + M_CAN_TSCC = 0x20, >> + M_CAN_TSCV = 0x24, >> + M_CAN_TOCC = 0x28, >> + M_CAN_TOCV = 0x2c, >> + M_CAN_ECR = 0x40, >> + M_CAN_PSR = 0x44, >> +/* TDCR Register only available for version >=3.1.x */ >> + M_CAN_TDCR = 0x48, >> + M_CAN_IR = 0x50, >> + M_CAN_IE = 0x54, >> + M_CAN_ILS = 0x58, >> + M_CAN_ILE = 0x5c, >> + M_CAN_GFC = 0x80, >> + M_CAN_SIDFC = 0x84, >> + M_CAN_XIDFC = 0x88, >> + M_CAN_XIDAM = 0x90, >> + M_CAN_HPMS = 0x94, >> + M_CAN_NDAT1 = 0x98, >> + M_CAN_NDAT2 = 0x9c, >> + M_CAN_RXF0C = 0xa0, >> + M_CAN_RXF0S = 0xa4, >> + M_CAN_RXF0A = 0xa8, >> + M_CAN_RXBC = 0xac, >> + M_CAN_RXF1C = 0xb0, >> + M_CAN_RXF1S = 0xb4, >> + M_CAN_RXF1A = 0xb8, >> + M_CAN_RXESC = 0xbc, >> + M_CAN_TXBC = 0xc0, >> + M_CAN_TXFQS = 0xc4, >> + M_CAN_TXESC = 0xc8, >> + M_CAN_TXBRP = 0xcc, >> + M_CAN_TXBAR = 0xd0, >> + M_CAN_TXBCR = 0xd4, >> + M_CAN_TXBTO = 0xd8, >> + M_CAN_TXBCF = 0xdc, >> + M_CAN_TXBTIE = 0xe0, >> + M_CAN_TXBCIE = 0xe4, >> + M_CAN_TXEFC = 0xf0, >> + M_CAN_TXEFS = 0xf4, >> + M_CAN_TXEFA = 0xf8, >> +}; >> + >> +/* address offset and element number for each FIFO/Buffer in the Message RAM */ >> +struct mram_cfg { >> + u16 off; >> + u8 num; >> +}; >> + >> +struct m_can_classdev; >> + >> +typedef int (*can_dev_init) (struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class); >> +typedef int (*can_clr_dev_interrupts) (struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class); >> +typedef u32 (*can_reg_read) (struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int reg); >> +typedef int (*can_reg_write) (struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int reg, int val); >> +typedef u32 (*can_fifo_read) (struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int addr_offset); >> +typedef int (*can_fifo_write) (struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int addr_offset, int val); > > No typedefs in the kernel, please! > OK. Just following some other conventions. I can remove >> +struct m_can_classdev { >> + struct can_priv can; >> + struct napi_struct napi; >> + struct net_device *net; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct clk *hclk; >> + struct clk *cclk; >> + >> + struct workqueue_struct *wq; >> + struct work_struct tx_work; >> + struct sk_buff *skb; >> + >> + struct can_bittiming_const *bit_timing; >> + struct can_bittiming_const *data_timing; >> + >> + void *device_data; >> + >> + /* Device specific call backs */ >> + can_dev_init device_init; >> + can_clr_dev_interrupts clr_dev_interrupts; >> + can_reg_read read_reg; >> + can_reg_write write_reg; >> + can_fifo_read read_fifo; >> + can_fifo_write write_fifo; >> + >> + int version; >> + int freq; >> + u32 irqstatus; >> + >> + int pm_clock_support; >> + bool is_peripherial; >> + >> + struct mram_cfg mcfg[MRAM_CFG_NUM]; >> +}; >> + >> +struct m_can_classdev *m_can_core_allocate_dev(struct device *dev); >> +int m_can_core_register(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_dev); >> +void m_can_core_unregister(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_dev); >> +int m_can_core_get_clocks(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_dev); > > You use here three different prefixes: "m_can_core", "m_can_classdev" > and "m_can_dev". There should be just one principle name for the struct, > func, args and vars, e.g.: > > int m_can_device_register(struct m_can_device *mcan_dev); > OK I will commonize the naming. I may go with the above or call it m_can_class. Dan >> +void m_can_init_ram(struct m_can_classdev *priv); >> +void m_can_config_endisable(const struct m_can_classdev *priv, bool enable); >> + >> +int m_can_core_suspend(struct device *dev); >> +int m_can_core_resume(struct device *dev); >> +#endif /* _CAN_M_CAN_CORE_H_ */ >> > > Wolfgang > -- ------------------ Dan Murphy