Re: Expected driver behavior on Frame not asked (and other errors)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Am 16.12.2018 um 12:30 schrieb kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Hi!
> 
> What is the expected behavior of a can controller driver in case
> of the following detected situations?
> * TX-NOACK?
> * TX-BIT1 (CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT1)
> * TX-BIT0 (CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT0)
> 
> Should these mean immediately a BUS off or similar?

No, according to the CAN bus specification, the device should go to the
"error passive" state but not beyond (unfortunately, for the software).
This usually happens when no cable is connected.

Wolfgang.



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux