RE: [PATCH 0/6] can/peak_canfd: bundle of driver changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok thanks for the explanation.

AFAIK the problem has never been seen so far. All existing record lengths are multiples of 4. This is rather to prevent future IP core evolutions.


— Stéphane

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: vendredi 20 juillet 2018 16:21
> To: Stéphane Grosjean <s.grosjean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-can Mailing List <linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] can/peak_canfd: bundle of driver changes
>
> On 07/20/2018 02:43 PM, Stéphane Grosjean wrote:
> >
> >> Will add 1-5 to linux-can-next. Or is 1/6 better also stable material?
> >
> > Sorry, don't understand the question.
>
> The question is:
>
> Is patch "can/peak_canfd: improves 32-bit alignment" relevant for stable? Is
> this a problem that actually happens or one that has never been seen so far?
>
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
> Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


--
PEAK-System Technik GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft Darmstadt - HRB 9183
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Alexander Gach / Uwe Wilhelm
Unsere Datenschutzerklaerung mit wichtigen Hinweisen
zur Behandlung personenbezogener Daten finden Sie unter
www.peak-system.com/Datenschutz.483.0.html
--
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����*jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux