> Will add 1-5 to linux-can-next. Or is 1/6 better also stable material? Sorry, don't understand the question. — Stéphane > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: vendredi 20 juillet 2018 13:15 > To: Stéphane Grosjean <s.grosjean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-can Mailing > List <linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] can/peak_canfd: bundle of driver changes > > On 06/21/2018 03:23 PM, Stephane Grosjean wrote: > > That serie of patches is a bundle of changes to apply to the > > peak_pciefd driver. In addition to some cosmetic changes, last patch > > setup a workaround when running with 64-bit DMA addresses and the > PCAN-PCIe FD card. > > > > Stephane Grosjean (6): > > can/peak_canfd: improves 32-bit alignment > > can/peak_canfd: remove useless defined symbols > > can/peak_canfd: use ndev irq instead of pci_dev one > > can/peak_canfd: fix typo in error message > > can/peak_canfd: rearrange the way resources are released > > can/peak_canfd: forces allocation of 32-bit DMA logical addr only > > Will add 1-5 to linux-can-next. Or is 1/6 better also stable material? > > Marc > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | > Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | > Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | -- PEAK-System Technik GmbH Sitz der Gesellschaft Darmstadt - HRB 9183 Geschaeftsfuehrung: Alexander Gach / Uwe Wilhelm Unsere Datenschutzerklaerung mit wichtigen Hinweisen zur Behandlung personenbezogener Daten finden Sie unter www.peak-system.com/Datenschutz.483.0.html -- ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
