Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It is worth nothing that, ki->inval_counter is not initialized after > this cleanup. I think you meant "It is worth noting that, ...". Btw, is there a particular reason that you didn't want to pass in a pointer to a netfs_cache_resources struct? David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
