On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 at 17:25, David Howells wrote: > fs/nfs/Kconfig | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks for pushing this, David. And to be somehwat consistent (and since the merge window is still open), here's another one to remove EXPERIMENTAL from FSCACHE. I'm not touching the other *_FSCACHE options (AFS, 9P), as I don't know if they're working well enough. One more thing: last time I began my "reasoning" with "There's a bug in Ubuntu..." - let me just be clear here that this is not the main reasoning. I'm not too fond of Ubuntu's plan to "only include features without EXPERIMENTAL set - and I realize that it's not upstream's job to randomly mark Kconfig options in a way so that distribution XY is happy. However, I was more impressed by Arjan's comment that the EXPERIMENTAL flag is bogus anyway - so I figured we can get 2 things at once: remove a (now) bogus flag and make a distribution happy :-) Hope that's OK. Remove EXPERIMENTAL flag from FSCACHE Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/fs/fscache/Kconfig b/fs/fscache/Kconfig index 864dac2..cc94bb9 100644 --- a/fs/fscache/Kconfig +++ b/fs/fscache/Kconfig @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ config FSCACHE tristate "General filesystem local caching manager" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL select SLOW_WORK help This option enables a generic filesystem caching manager that can be -- BOFH excuse #101: Collapsed Backbone -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
