Dennis Heuer wrote: > to my last message (which has no bcc or whatever untypical in the > header) i received the following answer. do you know about them? > > Return-path: <root@xxxxxxxxxx> > Envelope-to: dh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:47:53 +0200 > Received: from mail.ctf.com.br ([201.63.119.87] helo=ctf.com.br) > by srvh02.vc-server.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) > (Exim 4.68) > (envelope-from <root@xxxxxxxxxx>) > id 1IhSAa-0005nj-Gq > for dh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:47:53 +0200 > BrmaOutput: root@localhost > Received: (from root@localhost) > by ctf.com.br (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) id l9FGsYGl022991; > Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:54:34 -0200 > Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:54:34 -0200 > Message-Id: <200710151654.l9FGsYGl022991@xxxxxxxxxx> > From: postmaster@xxxxxxxxxx > To: dennis heuer <dh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: (BRMA) Mensagem n_o autorizada One of the subscribed accounts is on a broken mail server which sends bounce messages back to the "author" (i.e. the person posting the message) rather than to the envelope sender (the listserv address, linux-c-programming-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). On a popular list (e.g. bugtraq), you can easily get a dozen or more bogus replies for each post (more if you post during common vacation times, due to broken auto-responders). -- Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-programming" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
