TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for
regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually
contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter.
On 10.05.22 17:29, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 10.05.22 12:36, Joey Corleone wrote:
>> On 24.02.22 21:08, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>
>>>> hci_update_accept_list_sync is returning the filter based on the error
>>>> but that gets overwritten by hci_le_set_addr_resolution_enable_sync
>>>> return instead of using the actual result of the likes of
>>>> hci_le_add_accept_list_sync which was intended.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: ad383c2c65a5b ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Enable advertising when
>>>> LL privacy is enabled")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: Use u8 filter_policy instead of int ret as variable to store the
>>>> result.
>>>>
>>>> net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c | 5 ++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> patch has been applied to bluetooth-stable tree.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Marcel
>>
>> Just to put you in the loop in case you have not noticed it yet: there
>> seems to be some kind of regression introduced by this patch. See
>> comment #5 of ticket 215768 where Damien Thébault bisected the kernel [1].
>
> #regzbot ^introduced 80740ebb7e1ad
> #regzbot title net: bluetooth: can't suspend while bluetooth is enabled.
> #regzbot ignore-activity
> #regzbot from: plum <plumerlis@xxxxxxxxx>
> #regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215768
#regzbot fixed-by: a9a347655d224fa284187
That fix landed in bluetooth-next. I wonder if that fix would better
have been merged in this cycle, as that will mean many users are exposed
to this for at least three more weeks, but whatever.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
