On 10.05.22 12:36, Joey Corleone wrote:
> On 24.02.22 21:08, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>>> hci_update_accept_list_sync is returning the filter based on the error
>>> but that gets overwritten by hci_le_set_addr_resolution_enable_sync
>>> return instead of using the actual result of the likes of
>>> hci_le_add_accept_list_sync which was intended.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ad383c2c65a5b ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Enable advertising when
>>> LL privacy is enabled")
>>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v2: Use u8 filter_policy instead of int ret as variable to store the
>>> result.
>>>
>>> net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> patch has been applied to bluetooth-stable tree.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Marcel
>
> Just to put you in the loop in case you have not noticed it yet: there
> seems to be some kind of regression introduced by this patch. See
> comment #5 of ticket 215768 where Damien Thébault bisected the kernel [1].
Thx for CCing the regressions list.
[TLDR: I'm adding this regression report to the list of tracked
regressions; all text from me you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form.]
To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm
adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot:
#regzbot ^introduced 80740ebb7e1ad
#regzbot title net: bluetooth: can't suspend while bluetooth is enabled.
#regzbot ignore-activity
#regzbot from: plum <plumerlis@xxxxxxxxx>
#regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215768
This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also
telling regzbot about it, as explained here:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/
Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags
pointing to the report (the mail this one replied to), as the kernel's
documentation call for; above page explains why this is important for
tracked regressions.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
