Dear Jakob,
Am 09.04.22 um 12:01 schrieb Jakob Hilmer:
From: Jakob hilmer <jakob@xxxxxxxxx>
*H*ilmer?
The test for `DISCOVERABLE` should be done with
`MGMT_SETTING_DISCOVERABLE` instead of `MGMT_OP_SET_DISCOVERABLE`.
---
src/adapter.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/adapter.c b/src/adapter.c
index 71de9e82b..f1197684e 100644
--- a/src/adapter.c
+++ b/src/adapter.c
@@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ static bool set_discovery_discoverable(struct btd_adapter *adapter, bool enable)
return true;
/* Reset discoverable filter if already set */
- if (enable && (adapter->current_settings & MGMT_OP_SET_DISCOVERABLE))
+ if (enable && (adapter->current_settings & MGMT_SETTING_DISCOVERABLE))
return true;
adapter->discovery_discoverable = enable;
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ static int update_discovery_filter(struct btd_adapter *adapter)
/* Only attempt to overwrite current discoverable setting when not
* discoverable.
*/
- if (!(adapter->current_settings & MGMT_OP_SET_DISCOVERABLE)) {
+ if (!(adapter->current_settings & MGMT_SETTING_DISCOVERABLE)) {
GSList *l;
for (l = adapter->discovery_list; l; l = g_slist_next(l)) {
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Kind regards,
Paul
