Hi Chris, On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 2:40 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:40 AM Chris Clayton <chris2553@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On 01/03/2022 18:57, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 10:34 AM Luiz Augusto von Dentz > > > <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Chris, > > >> > > >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 1:26 AM Chris Clayton <chris2553@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi Luiz, > > >>> > > >>> I guess you are hoping for PEBKAC :-) > > >>> > > >>> On 28/02/2022 21:20, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > >>>> Hi Chris, > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:02 PM Chris Clayton <chris2553@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi Luiz, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 28/02/2022 19:34, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi Chris, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 12:04 AM Chris Clayton <chris2553@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 24/02/2022 15:16, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> I'll try another bisection today, but limit its range to changes made in the net/bluetooth directory. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> That bisection has proved very difficult because the bluetooth "service" in kernels at some steps of the bisection were > > >>>>>>> completely borked to the extent that blueman's device-manager application wouldn't start and emitted the messages: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> blueman-manager 12.00.37 ERROR Manager:137 on_dbus_name_appeared: Default adapter not found, trying first available. > > >>>>>>> blueman-manager 12.00.37 ERROR Manager:141 on_dbus_name_appeared: No adapter(s) found, exiting > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Obviously, I don't know whether the problem I am trying to pinpoint is hiding behind this more fundamental problem with > > >>>>>>> the bluetooth "service", so being unable to say whether that kernel was good or bad, I had to skip. There seems to be a > > >>>>>>> batch of commits that mean that, whilst the kernel builds okay, hunting down a bluetooth-related problem is not > > >>>>>>> possible. Eventually and I cursed and gave up. Whatever was causing this breakage has obviously been fixed. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Please record the HCI with btmon, it must be producing something since > > >>>>>>>> it records even the mgmt commands. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Refreshed by a good night's sleep, I started another bisection (between 5.16 and 5.17-rc1) yesterday morning but this > > >>>>>>> time did not limit it to net/bluetooth. That was going okay until I ran into what I assume is the same batch of borked > > >>>>>>> kernels. I've been more persistent this time but have just had a run of 16 steps in which the bluetooth support in the > > >>>>>>> kernel is broken so badly that testing bluetooth is not possible. I will push on today, but I've suspended that activity > > >>>>>>> to get the hci trace that Luiz has asked for. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Using information from the bisect, I built a kernel that had tested as bad (but not borked). The commit is > > >>>>>>> f2b551fad8d8f2ac5e1f810ad595298381e0b0c5. As I've mentioned before, the problem with devices not connecting is > > >>>>>>> intermittent - for a given kernel, sometimes a connection works and other times it doesn't. On the first boot of this > > >>>>>>> kernel, my bluetooth devices could connect, Attached are 4 files related to this - the output from btmon, and the > > >>>>>>> related portions of daemon.log, kern.log and sys.log from /var/log/. Each of the these files is suffixed with ".good". > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I then powered down the laptop and booted into the same kernel. This time the bluetooth devices could not connect. Four > > >>>>>>> more files are attached for this boot and are suffixed with ".bad". I said in an earlier email that when connection > > >>>>>>> fails, there is no output from btmon, so that log is empty. That's still the case, but I guess that fact itself is a > > >>>>>>> clue to what the problem might be. What I can add, however, is that if, in that same bad kernel, I unload and then > > >>>>>>> reload the btusb module, connections start to work. Maybe that too is a clue. The same unload/load process revives > > >>>>>>> bluetooth on a kernel built after a pull of Linus' latest and greatest this morning. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Since I now have a workround, I'm going stop the current bisection that I was doing. I've done another couple of steps > > >>>>>>> this morning and both produced kernels on which I could not test bluetooth and had to tell git bisect to skip. If > > >>>>>>> however, I can provide any other diagnostics, please let me know. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Chris > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Can you try with the following patch: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/patch/20220228173918.524733-1-brian.gix@xxxxxxxxx/ > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> Sorry, that patch has made no difference. After the first boot my headphones connected okay, but after a power-down and > > >>>>> reboot they would not connect without an unload and reload of the btusb module. > > >>>> > > >>>> Can you tell us exactly what steps you are using? Are you applying on > > >>>> top of what, rc6? > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Until I got your patch yesterday, I was using a clone of > > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git which I update frequently and have been doing so for as > > >>> long as I can remember. Just in case there was a hidden flaw in that tree, I took a new clone yesterday, (so yes, the > > >>> patch was tested on top of rc6) copied over the .config file and applied the patch. Then I built and installed the > > >>> kernel, updated grub, powered off the laptop and booted into the new kernel. Once the laptop had booted and logged in to > > >>> my LXQt desktop, I powered on my headphones and a connection was establisehed almost straight away. I powered the > > >>> headphones off and the disconnection worked fine. > > >>> > > >>> Knowing that the problem crops up intermittently, I then rebooted the laptop. When the boot was complete, I then powered > > >>> on my bluetooth headphones an waited for them to connect to the laptop. After about 20 seconds, a connection had not > > >>> been established. I powered off the headphones, used modprobe to unload and then reload the btusb module. When I powered > > >>> on the headphones, a connectiin was established within 2 or 3 seconds. > > > > > > Ive attempted 5 restart with 5.17.0-0.rc6.109.fc37.x86_64, my headset > > > was able to reconnect every single time without any problem. The only > > > > For your five tests, did it connect on the first boot? As I've said, sometimes it fails to connect on the first boot, > > but if it succeeds, it has always failed after a power-off and restart. Looking back at the notes I took during the > > bisect, I've didn't have a single bisection step where I had to boot more more than twice to ascertain that it was a bad > > kernel. As I said, I didn't mark a kernel as good until I'd had five successful boots. > > It did connect every single time. > > > > normally, once from gdm and then another time when gnome is loading, > > > but I assume it is normal nowadays since it appears when switching > > > session pipewire unregisters its audio endpoints. > > > > > > > I don't use pipewire. Prior to 5.17, bluetooth has worked more or less trouble free for at least 4 years. I've read > > about pipewire in Linux Magazine but don't see what it would bring to my party except complication. > > > > ends on how bluetoothd is being > > > started or something. > > > > > > > Did you see the warnings that read "Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected event 0xff length: 5 > 0"? That seems to indicate that > > something is sending events that are unexpected. What effect will that have? As I said, according to lshw, my system's > > bluetooth hardware is Intel AX201. Is that what you are testing on? > > I have an AX200 on my system, AX201 is very similar so Id be surprised > if that is the problem, btw Ive also got some unexpected events but > that didn't stop the headset to reconnect. > > > >>> I've booted this laptop countless times over the last few days. Doing the bisect, I didn't mark a commit as good until I > > >>> had done five boots and been able to connect my headphones on each boot. What I can say from that work is that two > > >>> consecutive boots into a working kernel are very rare. I can't remeber an occasion when it took more than two boots to > > >>> establish that a kernel was bad. > > >> > > >> Do commands such as bluetoothctl power on or scan on works? Try > > >> running bluetoothd -dn from a shell (disable bluetooth.service), also > > >> are there any settings changed in main.conf? > > >> > > > > Sorry, I forgot to answer this question earlier. I haven't changed main.conf. Besides, my bluetooth devices connect > > successfully every time with 5.16.11 and 5.15.25 kernels. As I've said before, that strongly suggests that there is a > > code regression in 5.17. > > Not saying there isn't something wrong, we have sent a couple of fixes > that doesn't seem to be merged yet, and we are working on another one > for fixing the scan: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/f648f2e11bb3c2974c32e605a85ac3a9fac944f1.camel@xxxxxxxxxx/T/ Btw, are you by any chance doing something like hciconfig hci0 up on your init scripts? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Luiz Augusto von Dentz > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz
