Hi Jakub, >>> It doesn't take a data pointer, so not really analogous to >>> skb_put_data() and friends which come to mind. But I have >>> no better naming suggestions. You will need to respin, tho, >>> if you want us to apply these directly, the patches as posted >>> don't apply to either netdev tree. >> >> I cross posted it to net-dev just in case you guys had some strong >> opinions on introducing such a function, > > Someone else still may, I don't :) > >> it was in fact suggested by Dan but I also didn't find a better name >> so I went with it, if you guys prefer we can merge it in >> bluetooth-next first as usual. > > Going via bluetooth-next sounds good! if you are ok with this going via bluetooth-next, then I need some sort of ACK from you or Dave. Regards Marcel
