Hi Miao, On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:44 PM Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Luiz, > > The style check was modified recently,so we are not sure about this > particular license warning. Can you provide some guidance here? Don't worry about that, I will be working to support the SDPX license identifier but that is something we can ignore for now. > Thanks, > Miao > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:28 PM <bluez.test.bot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! > > > > Dear submitter, > > > > Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. > > While we are preparing for reviewing the patches, we found the following > > issue/warning. > > > > Test Result: > > checkpatch Failed > > > > Outputs: > > WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 > > #94: FILE: src/adv_monitor.c:1: > > +/* > > > > WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 > > #247: FILE: src/adv_monitor.h:1: > > +/* > > > > - total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 235 lines checked > > > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > > > Your patch has style problems, please review. > > > > NOTE: Ignored message types: COMMIT_MESSAGE COMPLEX_MACRO CONST_STRUCT FILE_PATH_CHANGES MISSING_SIGN_OFF PREFER_PACKED SPLIT_STRING SSCANF_TO_KSTRTO > > > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > > > > > > > > --- > > Regards, > > Linux Bluetooth -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz
